CALCULATORS / PCB INTERCONNECT AND PACKAGING
Via-array current sharing screening calculator
Identical vias share DC current equally; mutual thermal effects omitted.
SCENARIO COMPARISON
Compare the numbers.
This source describes an analytical model. Its quantities and checks are the view.
| Scenario | perViaA | equivalentohm | lossW |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.25 | 0.00025 | 0.00625 | |
| 1 | 0.00025 | 0.004 |
All calculated quantities are listed with the inputs. Switch to Source to inspect the equations.
Change an input to see the consequences.
BASELINE INPUTS
CALCULATED
Edits change the baseline source.
Illustrative first-order example. Checks are editable requirements, not design standards. The broader topic may require additional equations, data, and validation.
Formula and units
This example uses the following equations. Input names and units match the editable source above.
- per via
perVia = current/count [A]- equivalent
equivalent = singleResistance/count [ohm]- loss
loss = current^2*equivalent [W]
Original worked example
These are the baseline values in the downloadable source. Edits above let you test your own values.
Given
- current
- 5 A
- count
- 4
- single resistance
- 0.001 ohm
Calculated
- per via
- 1.25 A
- equivalent
- 0.00025 ohm
- loss
- 0.00625 W
Assumptions and limits
Identical vias share DC current equally; mutual thermal effects omitted.
The requirement checks use the limits written in this example. Passing a check does not establish that the model covers every load, material behavior, or operating condition in a real design.
Download this .napkin example ↓Take it further with your agent
Napkin keeps the inputs, equations, checks and assumptions together in one study. Your agent sets it up; you change the numbers.
codex 'Use Napkin (https://napkin.engineering/mcp, or the local Napkin plugin) to build a study: Via-array current sharing screening. Inputs: via geometry/count; connection symmetry; current. Outputs: idealized sharing; aggregate resistance. Model scope: Explicit stackup and trace/via geometry; empirical models identified. Read napkin_capabilities and the current snapshot. Ask me for the values that matter, label assumptions with units, author .napkin source, validate it and apply it with napkin_source using the current revision, then open the study. Add checks for the limits I supply. Keep unsupported analyses explicit.'Claude needs the Napkin connector; Codex needs the Napkin plugin. Set up your agent ↗
The broader study
The topic brief below describes the broader scope. The worked example above states the particular calculation it implements.
- Inputs: via geometry/count, connection symmetry, current
- Outputs: idealized sharing, aggregate resistance
- Modes: calculate, compare, sweep
- Drawing: Layer viewer and cross section
EXECUTABLE WORKED EXAMPLE · FIRST-ORDER MODEL · CHECK THE SCOPE & ASSUMPTIONS
More in pcb interconnect and packaging
- PCB trace resistance calculator
- PCB trace current from allowed power loss calculator
- Via resistance and loss calculator
- Microstrip impedance estimate calculator
- Transmission line impedance from inductance and capacitance
- Differential impedance from odd-mode impedance calculator
- Interconnect propagation and length matching calculator
- Decoupling impedance budget calculator
- PCB clearance requirement comparison calculator
- Board and enclosure fit calculator
- Component height and enclosure clearance calculator